Why New Hampshire Thinks It’s Smarter Than Iowa

“Iowa picks corn, New Hampshire picks presidents” is a favorite slogan in the state, where Republicans tend to have a libertarian streak.

Share full article

Near Pittsburg, N.H., this month. For much of the Republican Party, a focus on fiscal issues has been replaced by the magnetism of former President Donald J. Trump, who won the state’s 2016 primary by nearly 20 percentage points.

Now that the Republican presidential primary race has moved to New Hampshire from Iowa, a few things will change.

The evangelical Christian social conservatism that dominates Iowa’s Republican politics is out, replaced by fiscal hawkishness and a libertarian streak rooted in the Granite State’s “Live Free or Die” ethos.

With Iowa fully in the rearview mirror, expect to hear a variation on the phrase “Iowa picks corn, New Hampshire picks presidents,” a favorite local slogan that aggrandizes the state’s role in the nominating process. Still, ask Pat Buchanan and John McCain about how winning New Hampshire in 1996 and 2000 catapulted them to the White House.

One thing is clear: New Hampshire Republicans think their attention to federal spending and the national debt makes them a lot smarter than their Iowa brethren, for whom abortion and transgender issues have been atop the agenda.

“You have a more sophisticated electorate in New Hampshire,” said Ryan Williams, a Republican operative who got his start in the state working for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaigns. “New Hampshire voters exude rugged individualism and flinty Yankee frugality. It’s a different situation.”

Exit polls from Iowa suggested that many of the state’s Republican caucusgoers decided to back former President Donald J. Trump long before the campaign’s final stretch there. New Hampshire voters have a well-earned reputation for making their decisions late. Mr. McCain’s 2008 victory — which did propel him to the nomination — followed a final surge over Mr. Romney and other rivals.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.