By Carol Rosenberg
Reporting from Guantánamo Bay, Cuba
March 1, 2024Updated 11:47 a.m. ET
- Share full article
The News
The judge in the Sept. 11 case has announced that he will stay on the bench through 2024, providing continuity as pretrial litigation wraps up crucial issues. Col. Matthew N. McCall, the fourth military officer to preside in the long-running case, had initially planned to retire from the Air Force next month.
Image
The timetable could allow Col. Matthew N. McCall to wrap up witness testimony in the Sept. 11 case at Guantánamo Bay and decide whether prosecutors can use confessions made by Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.Credit…Marisa Schwartz Taylor/The New York Times
Why It Matters: Continuity at a key time.
Colonel McCall has been on the case since August 2021. He has displayed a deep understanding of both the obstacles to a trial and the record his three predecessors built after arraignment in 2012.
He was initially expected to retire in April, a timetable that would have left it to a fifth judge to make key decisions — after absorbing hundreds of pages of filings and exhibits and more than 42,000 pages of public and classified transcripts. Now, Colonel McCall can proceed with witness testimony in open and closed sessions and legal arguments for at least 19 more weeks in 2024.
What Happens Next: Hearings and, probably, rulings.
The timetable positions Colonel McCall to wrap up witness testimony and decide whether prosecutors can use confessions made in 2007 by Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who is accused of masterminding of the Sept. 11 plot, and three co-defendants, at the eventual trial. The men spent years in detention in C.I.A. prisons, where they were tortured. Then so-called clean teams at Guantánamo Bay questioned them without threats or violence in their fourth year in U.S. custody.
Two other key issues are reaching decision points. One is whether restrictions imposed on defense lawyers prevent the defendants from getting a fair trial. In 2018, the first judge threw out the 2007 confessions for that reason. His successors have been revisiting that question ever since.
The other issue is whether what was done to the Sept. 11 defendants in their first years in U.S. custody constitutes “outrageous government conduct.” Lawyers for one defendant, Mustafa al-Hawsawi, have presented their argument to the judge, who has yet to rule. The delay could give the other three defense teams time to do the same.
What We Don’t Know: The fate of pretrial litigation.
Colonel McCall could order a range of remedies if he rules against the government on those three crossroads questions. He could exclude the 2007 clean-team statements, which an Army judge did last year in Guantánamo’s other capital case, forcing a higher court appeal. He could reduce the maximum possible sentence for a conviction to life in prison, instead of death; or he could dismiss the case.
Go Deeper: Related reading.
Our Who’s Who Guide for the Sept. 11 case at Guantánamo Bay.
Colonel McCall’s earlier plan to retire, and the disappointment of Sept. 11 families.
Our article on a crossroads ruling in Guantánamo’s other capital case.
Lost witnesses and fading memories are already impeding the Sept. 11 case.
Carol Rosenberg reports on the wartime prison and court at Guantánamo Bay. She has been covering the topic since the first detainees were brought to the U.S. base in 2002. More about Carol Rosenberg
- Share full article
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com
