Edward Ryan’s decision to leave the hybrid military-civilian court after 15 years signals that the trial of five men accused of conspiring in the hijackings will not begin soon.
- Share full articleShare free access
An entrance to the legal complex at Guantánamo Bay. The Sept. 11 case has been mired in pretrial hearings for years.
One of the longest-serving prosecutors in the Sept. 11, 2001, case is stepping down, citing the pressure of his repeated trips to Guantánamo Bay on him and his family.
The prosecutor, Edward R. Ryan, is a Justice Department lawyer who served on a team of civilian and military prosecutors who for 15 years have sought to start the trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other prisoners accused of conspiring in the hijackings that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, in Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon.
Mr. Ryan’s decision was seen as a sign that the case would not be going to trial anytime soon.
He represented the government at the prisoners’ original court appearance at Guantánamo in 2008 and participated in nearly all the pretrial hearings since then.
On Wednesday, Mr. Ryan told family members of victims of the attacks by email that he was leaving “with the heaviest heart” to return to North Carolina, where he was a federal prosecutor before his Guantánamo assignment.
“The challenges that come with the passage of time and trying to work so far from home have simply become too difficult for me and my extended family,” he said.
The case has been mired in pretrial hearings over what evidence would be admissible at the national security trial, which is expected to last more than a year when it eventually starts.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com