The ruling could require many convicted rioters to be resentenced, but it may mean little in light of a broader Supreme Court decision due by June.
- Share full article
Larry R. Brock Jr. was sentenced to two years in prison for his role in the riot, where he was videotaped wearing a helmet and a tactical vest and holding a set of plastic flex cuffs.
A federal appeals court panel on Friday ordered the resentencing of a Jan. 6 rioter after overturning a trial judge’s decision to apply a longer sentence range on the grounds that the rioter had interfered with the administration of justice, potentially opening the door for scores of other convicted rioters to be resentenced on the same basis.
In its decision, the three-judge panel found that the man’s storming of the U.S. Capitol did not amount to a “substantial interference with the administration of justice.” The panel ruled that the process urging the trial judge to add time to his sentence on that basis — a step known as an enhancement — had been improperly applied.
At the same time, the court upheld his felony conviction for obstructing Congress’s certification of the electoral count. That reaffirmed the legal viability of a central charge in the cases against hundreds of rioters, as well as the federal indictment against former President Donald J. Trump.
The decision on Friday preceded a Supreme Court case in which the justices will consider the scope of that same charge — corruptly obstructing an official proceeding — and whether it can be used against Mr. Trump in two of the four counts he faces in the election interference case brought by the special counsel, Jack Smith.
The appeals court ruling on Friday may not lead to any immediate benefit or reduced sentences for other Jan. 6 defendants, though many may have to be similarly resentenced.
But depending on the Supreme Court’s ruling, the broader decision about the obstruction charge could effectively invalidate convictions and upend the continuing cases against hundreds of rioters charged with felony obstruction.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com