Officials recently discovered that some people with driver’s licenses issued before 1996 might not have proof of citizenship on file, a state requirement since 2004.
- Share full article
A court ruled that some voters in Arizona would be allowed to vote in state and local elections despite a database glitch that made it unclear whether they had submitted proof of citizenship.
Arizona’s Supreme Court ruled on Friday that nearly 100,000 residents whom officials could not verify were U.S. citizens because of an administrative glitch would remain eligible to vote in state and local elections in November.
Their voting status had been thrust into limbo this month when officials in Arizona, a battleground state with about 4.1 million voters, discovered a problem with their data.
The problem appeared to affect voters who were issued driver’s licenses before 1996, eight years before Arizona enacted a law in 2004 that required voters to provide proof of citizenship to be able to participate in state elections.
If those license holders never voted or updated their registration information, their proof of citizenship might not be on file, limiting their participation to federal elections only.
In a nine-page decision, Ann A. Scott Timmer, the court’s chief justice, wrote that it was “possible” that the affected voters had, in fact, provided satisfactory evidence that they were U.S. citizens.
“We are unwilling on these facts to disenfranchise voters en masse from participating in state contests,” Chief Justice Timmer wrote. “Doing so is not authorized by state law and would violate principles of due process.”
The court issued its ruling after Adrian Fontes, the Democratic secretary of state, directed counties to grant full eligibility to the affected voters and after Stephen Richer, a Republican who is the county recorder of Maricopa County, filed an emergency petition asking the state’s top court to clarify the status of the voters.
An analysis by the secretary of state’s office found that the glitch threatened to affect roughly 98,000 voters, including more Republicans than Democrats.
In a social media post on Friday, Mr. Richer thanked the court for its swift resolution.
“The 100k registrants will continue to vote a full ballot this election,” he wrote on X. “Thank God.”
Mr. Fontes praised the court’s decision in a statement on Friday.
“Today marks a significant victory for those whose fundamental right to vote was under scrutiny,” he said. “The court faced a stark choice: to allow voters to participate in just a few federal races on a limited ballot, or to make their voices heard across hundreds of decisions on a full ballot that includes a variety of local and state offices.”
Neil Vigdor covers politics for The Times, focusing on voting rights issues and election disinformation. More about Neil Vigdor
See more on: 2024 Elections: News, Polls and Analysis, U.S. Politics, Republican Party
- Share full article
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com
