An ousted speaker, internal divisions and a race to the exits characterized the first year of the chaos-wracked Republican majority.
- Share full article
The first House session of the 118th Congress will be remembered for the unprecedented 15 roll call votes it took to elect a speaker, whom it later dumped.
The Republican-led House of Representatives concluded a year of paralysis and dysfunction on Thursday with the latest in a string of failures to act on a pressing crisis, leaving undone a sweeping emergency spending measure to send another infusion of money to Ukraine for its war against Russia.
It was a startling outcome but also a fitting finale for one of the most tumultuous and unproductive legislative years in recent memory, characterized by Republican infighting and a tiny majority that left House G.O.P. leaders toiling to do even the bare minimum of governing.
The inability to reach any agreement with the Senate to bolster a key U.S. ally that is facing off against President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia — even as clear majorities in the House and Senate strongly support doing so — only underscored the disarray.
Never mind that the House left town without making a dent in a pile of unfinished work on spending legislation to keep the government funded and was planning to return after New Year’s, with only eight working days to avoid a partial shutdown if they fail to complete it.
The first House session of the 118th Congress will be remembered mainly for the unprecedented 15 roll call votes it took in January to elect a speaker who was then unceremoniously dumped 10 months later by a Republican mutiny. That left the House leaderless and unable to work for weeks.
“This fall has been a very actively stupid political environment by a mistaken, misled few,” said Representative Patrick T. McHenry, the North Carolina Republican who filled in as speaker to oversee the election of Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana.
Like more than three dozen of his House colleagues to date, Mr. McHenry, a 10-term veteran, registered his opinion on the state of the chamber by announcing this month that he would not seek re-election next year. On Thursday alone, two more retirees announced their plans to depart, as Republicans and Democrats gave the House failing grades for 2023 and headed home for the holidays.
“It was historical and hysterical,” said Representative Steve Womack, Republican of Arkansas and a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, who helped block the election of Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio, as speaker. “In a word, I would say, ‘underwhelming.’”
The House did manage to narrowly avoid complete disasters of its own making. Congress barely headed off a calamitous federal default that hard-right Republicans were provoking by refusing to increase the debt limit without deep spending cuts. It also moved, with no time to spare, to avoid a government shutdown, again steering around the objections of the far right as its members continued to refuse to budge without slashing spending and imposing conservative social policies. Their positions proved impossible to sustain with Democrats in control of the White House and the Senate.
In the end, Speaker Kevin McCarthy embraced legislation to avert both economic crises and was forced to rely on Democrats to get debt limit suspension and stopgap spending bills to President Biden’s desk. His bow to reality prompted a handful of Republican adversaries, led by Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida, to force a vote to vacate the speakership, dethroning Mr. McCarthy and setting the House on a spiraling search for his successor.
ImageRepresentative Kevin McCarthy of California, the Republican former speaker, said he would leave Congress.Credit…Kent Nishimura for The New York Times
As he took the floor for a final time on Thursday, Mr. McCarthy, who began his career as a rising Republican star in a different era of House factionalism, said he would make the same moves again, even knowing what resulted.
“If your philosophy brings people more freedom, do not be fearful that you could lose your job over it,” he said on the floor as his California colleagues celebrated his time in the House. “I knew the day we decided to make sure to choose to pay our troops while war was breaking out instead of shutting down was the right decision.”
The House did end the year with bipartisan approval of a sweeping Pentagon policy measure. But again it could be delivered in the Republican-led House only with significant Democratic support. Far-right Republicans balked, unhappy that provisions aimed at ending what they viewed as “woke” military policies on abortion, transgender care and racial diversity were stripped out, and some members of both parties objected to an extension of warrantless surveillance authority.
Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic leader, took the opportunity to remind Republicans that the little they did get done should be credited to Democrats.
“Anything productive that has happened in this Congress — which is not much, because of the extreme MAGA Republicans — has occurred because House Democrats have led the way,” he said.
The hard-right element of House Republicans started the year on a high note, having extracted significant concessions from Mr. McCarthy in return for their support for his speakership bid. They saw themselves in the driver’s seat on spending and other policy issues. They flexed their muscles in nontraditional ways, including opposing the procedural motions required to bring bills to the floor, which have historically been strict party-line votes. That prevented their leaders from moving ahead on measures they opposed. Their party’s narrow margin of control empowered them.
Mr. McCarthy did frequently bend in their direction, but the path typically led to a dead end as the more extreme policies ran into opposition from both mainstream Republican conservatives and congressional Democrats.
On spending, for instance, Mr. McCarthy bowed to the far right and agreed to set levels below the debt limit agreement he reached with Mr. Biden, infuriating Democrats and frustrating Republicans. The conservative stance made it difficult to advance the legislation, and the appropriations process ended up in knots despite a Republican pledge to consider and pass 12 individual spending bills.
Given the stalemate, Mr. McCarthy plowed ahead and kept the government open at the end of September with Democratic votes. Mr. Johnson, quickly finding himself in the same situation, also relied on Democrats in November to keep government agencies funded into January, when the issue of a shutdown will again rear its head.
Rising Republican opposition to Ukraine funding stalled the Biden administration’s request for about $50 billion in additional security aid as House Republicans joined their Senate counterparts in demanding stringent border policies in exchange for backing it. That led to an impasse that could not be resolved before the House departed for the holidays.
Rather than give up on what they see as a critical foreign policy priority, Senate leaders decided to keep the chamber in session next week in hopes of striking a deal on border policy changes, even though success seemed like a long shot. Even if the Senate could come to terms on immigration changes, it was very uncertain whether they would be sufficient to prevail in the House.
ImageSpeaker Mike Johnson replaced Mr. McCarthy after a tumultuous period in the House.Credit…Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
There was no guarantee that 2024 would be any better — and it could potentially be worse given what will be a pitched battle for House control. Mr. McCarthy and Mr. Johnson have both sought to mollify House conservatives with a focus on impeaching Mr. Biden and challenging the administration on other fronts, but continued internal strife seems likely to continue, particularly given Mr. Johnson’s inexperience.
“There’s not a real sign out there that things are going to improve,” Mr. Womack said. “In fact, they could deteriorate.”
He added: “The roller coaster has kind of slowed in speed, and it’s kind of leveled out. But right around the bend up here, there’s going to be some more twists and turns and some loops and some other tracks that are going to maybe have us reaching for the barf bag.”
Kayla Guo contributed reporting.
Carl Hulse is the chief Washington correspondent, primarily writing about Congress and national political races and issues. He has nearly four decades of experience reporting in the nation’s capital. More about Carl Hulse
- Share full article
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com
