The Brief – The curious case of Denmark’s migration opt-out

The Brief – The curious case of Denmark’s migration opt-out | INFBusiness.com

The Netherlands and Hungary are unlikely to get an opt-out from the EU’s migration policy, rarely has it ever happened, when Denmark got theirs, they got lucky – and France got the Strasbourg seat.

Last Friday, newly appointed Dutch Prime Minister, Dick Schoof, announced the toughest asylum reform in the country’s history, including a call for an opt-out from the EU’s migration rules.

Shortly after the Dutch announcement, Hungarian Minister for European Affairs, Bóka János, joined the fray. On X, he wrote “the Hungarian government will join the Netherlands in asking for an opt-out from EU asylum and migration rules,” before adding the crucial “if a Treaty amendment allows it.”

For the Netherlands and Hungary to secure an opt-out, all member states would need to agree to reopen and amend the treaties.

On Wednesday (18 September), a Commission spokesperson acknowledged that “there’s no treaty change upcoming.”

So, while the announcement of the Dutch opt-out was hailed as a turning point in their migration policy, with Geert Wilders calling it a ‘mini-nexit’, there’s little chance that the vision will actually materialise.

My home country, Denmark, has more opt-outs from the EU aquis than any other member state, even after giving up one of them, its proviso on defence policy, in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Many Dutch politicians probably envied Denmark’s position, but the truth is, we arrived here through a mix of poor planning and missteps.

In 1991, the European Communities were planning on becoming the European Union by way of the Maastricht Treaty.

Convinced that the Danes were ready to take European integration to the next level, the Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, at the time arranged the Danish referendum before any other member state had had a chance to vote on it.

With 50.7% of the voters backing no, the Danes narrowly voted to reject the new treaty. As other member states were ratifying it, the Danish ‘no’ became a problem not only for the small Scandinavian country but also for the rest of the soon-to-be Union as all states needed to ratify for the treaty to come into effect.

To accommodate the obstinate Danes, heads of government met in the Scottish capital shortly before Christmas. The Edinburgh Agreement gave the Danes four opt-outs: on home and judicial affairs, union citizenship, the Euro, and common defence policy.

Put to a second vote, the Danes finally budged and ratified the Maastricht Treaty.

Curiously, the French government seized the moment in Scotland, because, while the text of the Maastricht Treaty does not mention the European Parliament’s seat in Strasbourg, the Edinburgh Agreement does.

Both the Danish opt-outs and the Strasbourg seat were later established in the Amsterdam Treaty of 1997. So next time you rant about the Parliament’s travelling circus, blame a Dane. My email address is in the footer.

The governments in The Hague and Budapest know very well that the chances of treaty change and getting opt-outs are slim. Denmark’s opt-outs resulted from a mixture of chance and necessity, not a strategy built on refusal alone.

Yet, Hungary and the Netherlands are sending a clear signal to Europe: They are not here to compromise or negotiate a middle ground but rather to draw a firm line on migration, regardless of the political cost or the practical limitations.

As it stands, they will have to wait.

The Roundup

Latest Policy Briefs

Agrifood Brief – Commission juggles Mercosur deal, anti-deforestation rules, and farmers’ anger

Economy Brief – France or Finland – whose industrial policy should prevail in Europe?

Tech Brief – The new Commission’s tech agenda, inside the Council telecoms negotiations

Euractiv takes some creative license, to imagine a 2029 farewell speech by Teresa Ribera, the incoming European Commission Executive Vice-President for the Clean Transition.

During a visit to Kyiv on Friday (20 September), European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a €35 billion EU loan to Ukraine, part of a G7 deal to raise $50 billion (€45 billion) backed by windfall profits from frozen Russian assets.

Germany remains critical of further EU-level measures to steer irregular migration amid a unilateral crackdown at its borders but may be open to a European initiative to conduct asylum procedures outside the EU, insiders told Euractiv. 

European Union member states are not convinced by Enrico Letta and Mario Draghi’s suggestions to deregulate the telecom sector, according to a working document dated Monday (16 September).

The European Parliament Research Service (EPRS) recommended that liability regulation include general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) products and a broader legal instrument for software liability, in a study released on Thursday (19 September).

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will propose a way out on the enforcement deadlock on the new anti-deforestation regulation, she told colleagues at a European People’s Party (EPP) meeting this week.

Source: euractiv.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *