EU ministers set to introduce in its negotiating position of the Crisis Management Regulation new rules allowing border control officials to prevent third-country nationals from crossing EU borders and applying for asylum in cases of so-called ‘instrumentalisation’, a diplomatic source told Euractiv.
The practice of governments opening their borders or encouraging migrants to cross into EU territory, known as ‘instrumentalisation’, has been used by the likes of Russia, Belarus and Morocco in recent years as a way to increase pressure on national border authorities.
“It seems now that instrumentalisation will not be a separate text but should be covered by the Crisis Management Regulation,” a diplomatic source told Euractiv.
The Crisis Management Regulation, which aims to deal with situations in which a large number of third-country nationals cross European borders in a short period of time, is currently under discussion by EU home affairs ministers and forms part of the proposed Migration and Asylum Pact.
The Pact, proposed by the European Commission in September 2020, is composed of ten legislative proposals which seek to revise and update the bloc’s migration policy.
According to the European Parliament’s position on the Crisis Management Regulation, adopted in April, the Commission would be responsible for deciding what constitutes a ‘crisis’ situation in a country. That would then trigger a solidarity clause for other EU countries who can decide how to help, for example, by providing money, equipment or offering their territory for migrant relocations.
In the context of crisis measures, EU ministers are now pushing to introduce an ‘exemption’ to normal processing of asylum claims for cases of ‘instrumentalisation’, Euractiv understands. This would apply when, for instance, countries like Belarus, Russia or Morocco encourage and/or facilitate third-country nationals from Africa or the Middle East to arrive in the EU through their countries.
The planned revision to the law would allow member states to give border guards the power to decide who can apply for asylum and who cannot.
It is not yet known how or according to whose authority cases would be classed as ‘instrumentalisations’.
Russia encourages migrants to cross Belarus to the EU, Baltic States warn
Russia organises flights from the Middle East to Moscow, giving migrants access to the Belarusian and then EU borders, ministers from the Baltic region said during a hearing with MEPs on Monday (4 September).
In early 2022, Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko opened Belarusian borders to a large number of third-country nationals from the Middle East and facilitated their transport to the country’s EU borders, a move which garnered significant international attention.
In June 2022, the Moroccan authorities opened the border with Spain, allowing a significant number of people to cross the border, in order to exert political pressure on Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez over a separate foreign policy matter.
The instrumentalisation proposal has been criticised by civil society groups as according to international law, any third-country national can apply for international protection when trying to enter the EU territory. Any expulsion without an assessment of the individual application is considered an illegal push-back.
Different organisations and media in Europe have documented how push-backs of third-country nationals have become increasingly regular across the EU in recent years.
Physical abuse of migrants prevalent in Europe, Council of Europe finds
The Council of Europe (CoE) identified a ‘clear pattern’ of physical abuse and torture in the context of illegal pushbacks of migrants by law enforcement officials, according to the annual report of the CoE anti-torture committee revealed on Thursday (30 March).
Lack of time
Tensions over the negotiations increased last week when the European Parliament’s migration working group decided to suspend trilogue talks on two key files of the pact (Eurodac and Screening) until EU ministers adopt a common position on the crisis management regulation.
The Parliament’s rapporteur on the crisis management file, Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar, declared on Monday (25 September) that the parliament could block the whole pact if EU ministers continued to “cut it into pieces”.
Once EU ministers adopt their position on the file, they have to find a common position with the European Parliament in the so-called trilogue, with which strong disagreements are increasing.
However, usually EU ministers have a stronger leverage when negotiating in the trilogues with the European Parliament, because specifically on migration, most of the powers and competences are at the national level.
According to the roadmap the EU institutions adopted in Autumn 2022, the files in the migration pact need to be approved before mid-February 2024.
Migration reform to be approved by 2024, say parliament leaders and diplomats
The European Parliament together with the permanent representatives of Czechia, Sweden, Spain, Belgium and France agreed to approve the Pact on Migration and Asylum by February 2024, to ensure that the legislation is adopted before the next European elections in May 2024.
If the EU did not manage to approve the pact before the end of the mandate, it would be the second time the institutions fail to approve and EU framework on migration.
[Edited by Benjamin Fox and Nathalie Weatherald]
Read more with EURACTIV
Berlin eyes 2030 EU enlargement but Poland remains an obstacleIn today’s edition of the Capitals, find out more about Poland wanting to tighten border checks with Slovakia, a Czech law amendment to address drug shortages drawing criticism, and so much more.
Source: euractiv.com
