Gov. Doug Ducey has been using federal pandemic aid to undermine school mask requirements, which Treasury said violated the law.
Gov. Doug Ducey is suing the Biden administration over its attempt to claw back stimulus funds that the Treasury Department says Arizona is using in violation of the law.
WASHINGTON — Gov. Doug Ducey of Arizona sued the Biden administration on Friday to block its efforts to claw back pandemic relief money that the state has been using to undercut mask requirements in schools.
The lawsuit is the latest legal fight between a Republican-led state and the Biden administration over how the $350 billion in state and local pandemic aid that Congress allocated last year can be used. It follows a series of warnings from the Treasury Department that Arizona could lose some of the $4.2 billion that it was awarded in the rescue package.
The funds in question relate to two education programs that Mr. Ducey, a Republican, established last year in response to mask requirements that some school districts in the state enacted. The state tried unsuccessfully to enact a law banning school mask mandates last year, but Mr. Ducey continues to oppose rules that require them.
The state has used federal money to help schools and students get around the mandates. A $163 million program, funded by federal relief money, provides up to $1,800 per pupil to public and charter schools but excludes schools that require masks.
A separate $10 million program funds vouchers worth up to $7,000 to help poor families leave districts that require face coverings or impose other Covid-related “constraints.”
The Treasury Department has insisted that these programs violate the intent of the 2021 $1.9 trillion stimulus law, which was aimed at mitigating the coronavirus by giving states funds to maintain public services and support businesses and households harmed by the health crisis.
The Treasury Department first issued a warning to Mr. Ducey in October, signaling that the funds being used for those programs could be recouped if Arizona did not halt or alter them. The federal government said that Arizona’s programs undermined evidence-based efforts to stop the spread of Covid-19 and that federal funds could not be used for those purposes.
The Coronavirus Pandemic: Latest Updates
Updated Jan. 21, 2022, 8:38 p.m. ET
- F.D.A. expands approval of remdesivir to patients who are not hospitalized.
- Arizona sues to try to keep U.S. from clawing back relief funds.
- Ireland relaxes Covid restrictions and prepares for a St. Patrick’s Day celebration.
In a second warning last week, the Treasury Department said that if Arizona did not cease or change the programs within 60 days, the federal government could start a process to recoup the money that it alleged was being misused. Treasury also said it could hold back the second installment of relief money that Arizona is scheduled to receive this year.
Mr. Ducey has rejected those arguments, and on Friday he said the state would fight back.
“The Biden administration is attempting to hold congressionally appropriated funds hostage and is trying to bully Arizona into complying with this power-grabbing move,” Mr. Ducey said. “They’re going after education programs that are designed to help kids access in-person instruction, ensure schools stay open and give parents the ability to make decisions that are best for their kids.”
Arizona’s attorney general, Mark Brnovich, sent Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen a letter this week suggesting that the state was preparing to take its concerns to court amid what he believed was “blatant federal encroachment.”
The Coronavirus Pandemic: Key Things to Know
Card 1 of 4
Omicron in retreat. Though the U.S. is still facing overwhelmed hospitals and nearly 2,000 Covid-19 deaths a day, encouraging signs are emerging. New cases are plummeting in several parts of the country, and recent studies of wastewater are helping scientists learn more about the Omicron variant.
Free tests and masks. The Biden administration’s new website allowing each U.S. household to order up to four free at-home tests is live. The White House also announced that it would make 400 million N95 masks available free of charge at health centers and pharmacies across the U.S.
Around the world. Austria is nearing the approval of a vaccine mandate for almost all adults, putting it on the path to be the first European country with such a wide-reaching mandate. In France, where a presidential election looms in April, officials set a timeline to lift restrictions over the next few weeks.
Staying safe. Worried about spreading Covid? Keep yourself and others safe by following some basic guidance on when to test, which mask to pick and how to use at-home virus tests. Here is what to do if you test positive for the coronavirus.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, argues that the Treasury Department is abusing its discretion to set conditions on how states spend the pandemic aid. It accuses the Treasury Department of acting “arbitrarily and capriciously” in determining that stopping the spread of the coronavirus is a condition for using the relief funds. And it says the Treasury Department does not have the expertise to make public health pronouncements.
Congress approved the state and local relief funds in March as part of the American Rescue Plan. Republicans opposed the law, but across the country they have been using the money to fill state coffers and to try to enact conservative policies.
The law gave the Treasury Department broad discretion to make rules governing how the money is spent and ensure that it is not being misused.
The Treasury Department on Friday defended its decision to restrict the use of the relief funds.
“Treasury believes the rule is correct and allowed by the statute and Constitution,” Dayanara Ramirez, a Treasury spokeswoman, said in a statement.
Several Republican-led states have already sued the Biden administration over a provision in the law that says states cannot use relief funds to subsidize tax cuts, claiming that the restriction is a violation of state sovereignty.
Mr. Ducey made a similar argument on Friday about attempts to stop his education programs.
“Unconstitutional overreach by one branch of government over another’s directive should not and cannot get in the way of that,” he said.
Source: nytimes.com
