An appendix to a high-profile prosecutorial brief, released last week, could become public next week. But much of it would be redacted.
Listen to this article · 4:20 min Learn more
- Share full article
President Donald J. Trump’s rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, preceded the riot at the Capitol.
The federal judge overseeing the 2020 election case against former President Donald J. Trump on Thursday approved a limited release of a compilation of evidence against him, but stayed her order for a week in case Mr. Trump’s legal team wants to challenge the disclosure.
Even if the court filing at issue — an appendix to a 165-page brief by the special counsel, Jack Smith, that was unsealed last week — becomes public, it appears unlikely to contain significant new revelations. The judge, Tanya S. Chutkan of the Federal District Court in Washington, said all nonpublic sensitive material in the appendix, like grand jury transcripts and witness interview reports, would remain entirely redacted.
Mr. Trump’s legal team has objected to unsealing any portion of the appendix, arguing that doing so amounts to interference in next month’s presidential election. The jostling over the material is the latest step in the case against Mr. Trump for his attempts to overturn his loss of the 2020 election, culminating in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.
In July, the Supreme Court granted Mr. Trump partial immunity from prosecution based on his official acts as president and sent the case back to Judge Chutkan to sort through which evidence and allegations are immune and which can still be used at any eventual trial. (Should Mr. Trump win the election and return to the presidency, he could use his power over the Justice Department to fire Mr. Smith and terminate the case.)
As an initial step, Mr. Smith filed under seal a lengthy brief detailing the evidence he wants to use and laying out arguments for why none of it should be considered immune. That brief contained no major new revelations that were not in the indictment, but added some new details and texture supporting the major allegations against Mr. Trump.
Mr. Smith also filed under seal a much lengthier appendix of the underlying transcripts, documents and other materials from which the quoted portions in his brief were derived. Following Judge Chutkan’s decision to unseal the brief last week, the fight is now over whether any or how much of that appendix should also become public as the final weeks of the 2024 campaign tick down.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com
