Gov. Tim Walz is viewed more favorably than Senator JD Vance by likely voters in Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin, according to New York Times/Siena College polls.
Listen to this article · 3:39 min Learn more
- Share full article
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, right, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, was less familiar to voters in three Midwestern states than was his Republican counterpart, Senator JD Vance of Ohio.
In the contest between Minnesota dad energy and “Hillbilly Elegy” energy, Midwestern voters appear to have a clear preference.
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, is viewed more favorably than his Republican counterpart, Senator JD Vance of Ohio, in three Midwestern states, according to polls from The New York Times and Siena College.
The polls, taken as the two men were preparing to face off in a debate on Tuesday, found that Mr. Walz was viewed favorably by 44 percent of likely voters in Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin and unfavorably by 41 percent. Mr. Vance was viewed favorably by 42 percent of likely voters in those states and unfavorably by 48 percent, the polls found. Both men were chosen in part to appeal to voters in the Midwest.
Voters were more likely to say that Mr. Walz was honest, trustworthy, and caring than they were to say the same about Mr. Vance.
About half of voters said that Mr. Walz was “honest and trustworthy” and that he “cares about people like me,” and about a third of voters said those terms did not describe him well. Voters were both less likely to say those descriptors applied to Mr. Vance and much more likely to say those qualities did not describe him well.
Mr. Walz was the only candidate on either major presidential ticket with more supporters than detractors across the three states.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: nytimes.com
